<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7176907081346374596</id><updated>2011-04-21T22:52:49.133-04:00</updated><category term='im'/><category term='pidgin'/><category term='jabber'/><category term='debian etch'/><category term='aim'/><title type='text'>Not a replicant</title><subtitle type='html'></subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://notareplicant.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7176907081346374596/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://notareplicant.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Jason</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>5</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7176907081346374596.post-1942123877595573228</id><published>2007-09-20T16:34:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-20T16:36:03.513-04:00</updated><title type='text'>does it come in a flat pack?</title><summary type='text'>Me: Can we login to the windows domain from here?D: I have no clue.Me: Can you get one?  It would be a great help to all of us.D: Do they sell them at Ikea?Me: Yes, but they spell it K-L-U with little accents over the U.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://notareplicant.blogspot.com/feeds/1942123877595573228/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7176907081346374596&amp;postID=1942123877595573228' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7176907081346374596/posts/default/1942123877595573228'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7176907081346374596/posts/default/1942123877595573228'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://notareplicant.blogspot.com/2007/09/does-it-come-in-flat-pack.html' title='does it come in a flat pack?'/><author><name>Jason</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7176907081346374596.post-9067617578399587464</id><published>2007-05-31T17:54:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-05-31T20:16:15.583-04:00</updated><title type='text'>feature that</title><summary type='text'>This New Yorker article has been well blogged about already, but here's my take.Engineers like features, marketers like features, sales likes features, and consumers like features.  Nobody I know will tell you "I wish my $PRODUCT wasn't able to do X." Adding features doesn't cause problems, but lack of thoughtful design does.  There are ways to get the features you want without causing overload.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://notareplicant.blogspot.com/feeds/9067617578399587464/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7176907081346374596&amp;postID=9067617578399587464' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7176907081346374596/posts/default/9067617578399587464'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7176907081346374596/posts/default/9067617578399587464'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://notareplicant.blogspot.com/2007/05/feature-that.html' title='feature that'/><author><name>Jason</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7176907081346374596.post-1197161258821785892</id><published>2007-05-03T11:35:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2007-05-03T11:35:35.258-04:00</updated><title type='text'>we need a plan</title><summary type='text'>Do you think your project goals are daunting?  Do you feel mired in action items and deliverables?  Is it all just too much?  Maybe some good examples are needed to remind us what's possible, and how to get it done.Outline of Operation Overlord, or how to liberate a country one action item at a timeProject Apollo: A Retrospective Analysis, or how to write a new rulebook completely from scratchOne</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://notareplicant.blogspot.com/feeds/1197161258821785892/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7176907081346374596&amp;postID=1197161258821785892' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7176907081346374596/posts/default/1197161258821785892'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7176907081346374596/posts/default/1197161258821785892'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://notareplicant.blogspot.com/2007/05/we-need-plan.html' title='we need a plan'/><author><name>Jason</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7176907081346374596.post-4872829658327948709</id><published>2007-04-12T08:28:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-04-12T08:39:45.612-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='jabber'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='pidgin'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='debian etch'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='im'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='aim'/><title type='text'>to infinity, and beyond</title><summary type='text'>etchDebian etch was released recently, which is very pleasing if you've had a hankering to run the most recent packages and not have to concern yourself with recent updates.  Still, when I do an 'apt-get upgrade' now, it's a little letdown to see that there's no shiny new stuff to be had.  It probably won't be long before I start carefully pulling in stuff from testing just for fun.pidginAs I </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://notareplicant.blogspot.com/feeds/4872829658327948709/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7176907081346374596&amp;postID=4872829658327948709' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7176907081346374596/posts/default/4872829658327948709'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7176907081346374596/posts/default/4872829658327948709'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://notareplicant.blogspot.com/2007/04/to-infinity-and-beyond.html' title='to infinity, and beyond'/><author><name>Jason</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7176907081346374596.post-7393435628233739099</id><published>2007-04-09T12:16:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-04-09T12:44:18.952-04:00</updated><title type='text'>more is better</title><summary type='text'>Slashdot recently had another iteration of the "is more better?" post with regard to display area.  This time it concerns dual displays, the last time it was about size.I can say that having two displays is without a doubt better than one.  At work, I have both monitors running at 1280x1024, with the right one dedicated to Firefox and our server monitoring app, the left one to xterms and a tabbed</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://notareplicant.blogspot.com/feeds/7393435628233739099/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7176907081346374596&amp;postID=7393435628233739099' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7176907081346374596/posts/default/7393435628233739099'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7176907081346374596/posts/default/7393435628233739099'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://notareplicant.blogspot.com/2007/04/more-is-better.html' title='more is better'/><author><name>Jason</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
